Ocean Wave Power for New Zealand – a Reality Check

Now that we’ve all had time to see how the Rena disaster has played out, a number of later lessons, versus early lessons can be taken. Our marine infrastructure, after a slow start, is doing a plucky job in cleaning up the spilt oil and safely removing the rest. But as for removing the containers, we must wait patiently for the large marine crane from Singapore to arrive and – as for removing all traces of the Rena from Astrolabe Reef itself – that will be the magician’s trick we are all waiting to see!

What all this underlines is that marine disasters nearly always require very case-specific, carefully calculated plans to be worked through and co-ordinated. There’s nothing routine about anything to do with the Rena. But marine disaster co-ordinators in more advanced countries typically have more options – more pieces on the watery chessboard to move around – than they do here. That’s basically because those countries, like the USA, the UK, Sweden, Denmark, Holland and Singapore, have much larger and more sophisticated marine infrastructures than we do. They have significant navies, testing tanks, shipbuilding industries, industrial ports, dry-docks, floating cranes, tug boat fleets, and a menagerie of highly specialised ships, such as those dedicated to the offshore oil drilling industry. As a further bonus, the Europe-centred countries are all in much closer proximity than we are to any other country, so that any resource any one of them may urgently require can be quickly be hired – at competitive prices – from the others.

I can tell you first hand that brainstorming about wave energy is great fun. It produces much the same buzz you get from reading Jules Verne novels. Even my broad-brush Calculations page (have a play) paints a very optimistic picture. There is certainly a lot of energy in waves! Even so, wave power is fundamentally a tertiary effect. The primary source of energy is from the Sun. That generates the secondary source – wind – and that, in turn, eventually generates third-stage energy in the form of waves. Each stage results in a drop in efficiency. At the primary end, even though solar power has its own inefficiencies, costs and scores the occasional own-goal, it is becoming more and more attractive with every year that passes. At the secondary stage – wind power – prospects are also looking strong and might be even stronger if wind turbines were placed over the wind-swept sea, as they already are in many countries. Stronger again if the new generation of vertical axis turbines can shake off the bad reputation their disintegrating first generation ones left.

So, with all those thoughts and the Rena in mind, Let’s look at just how economically feasible the generation of electricity using ocean waves around the New Zealand coastline could ever really be. At this point, however, we must distinguish between the possible use of tides –  in Cook Strait or the Kaipara harbour for example – and the use of waves  from the open ocean to generate electricity. Tidal power certainly requires a strong marine infrastructure but its almost perfect predictability, coupled with its similarity to fresh water hydro power, at least enables costs to be accurately calculated.

A good take on the on-going world-wide effort on ocean wave power is the Wikipedia Wave Power article. Here we see an amazing collection of very  “Vernesque” devices. New Zealand has a few of its own but none is at full scale.

One full scale wave power device which has emerged is the Pelamis  which consists of three or more huge, semi-submerged cylindrical sections linked by hinged joints. As waves pass along the length of the machine, the sections move relative to one another. That motion is resisted by hydraulic cylinders which pump high pressure oil into tanks. That oil pressure can then turn electrical generators. Power from all the joints is fed down a single umbilical cable to a junction on the sea bed. Several devices can be connected together and linked to shore through a single seabed cable.

All of which sounds reasonable but let’s think about the length of this giant sea snake. At 180 meters, its nearly as long as the Rena (236 m). What would happen it broke loose from its moorings and ended up on the rocks of some remote West Coast beach? Even if it didn’t shed its own oil and could be repaired, how would it be towed back out to sea? If somehow salvers did succeed with that, to which large dry-dock would they tow it? This would likely be the West Coast, remember. And, aside from all that, what would the power cables be doing all this time? Would commercial divers be required to salvage and eventually re-connect them? And when would the service vessel be able to safely go there – when the waves subsided? But the position would have been chosen precisely for the waves being as large and as constant as possible.

Even in absence of accidents like the above, the routine maintenance would still involve many of the above factors – tug boats, dry docks and divers at a minimum and there is the fact that the West Coast is far from the National Grid. In that long journey, more of the power would be lost in transmission.

OK, I think you’ve got the idea, so let’s not even bother to add in the likely huge costs of the many and varied resource consents and related legalistic hurdles.The bottom line is that the net number of dollars per kilowatt from ocean wave power for New Zealand will probably never be competitive in a free, unsubsidised energy market.

This entry was posted in Energy and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to Ocean Wave Power for New Zealand – a Reality Check

  1. I wanted to follow along and let you know how , a great deal I loved discovering this blog today. I would consider it the honor to operate at my business office and be able to use the tips shared on your web site and also be involved in visitors’ comments like this. Should a position regarding guest writer become available at your end, please let me know.

  2. Very interesting points you have noted, regards for posting.

  3. I really enjoy reading on this internet site, it has got wonderful content. “One should die proudly when it is no longer possible to live proudly.” by Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche.

    • admin says:

      Thanks. I’d say its always possible to live proudly because you can always take pride in whatever small contribution you can make
      Phillip

  4. landscape says:

    I really appreciate this post. I’ve been looking all over for this! Thank goodness I found it on Bing. You have made my day! Thx again!

  5. I’m impressed, I must say. Actually hardly ever do I encounter a weblog that’s each educative and entertaining, and let me tell you, you’ve got hit the nail on the head. Your thought is excellent; the problem is something that not enough individuals are speaking intelligently about. I’m very happy that I stumbled throughout this in my seek for something referring to this.

  6. mulch says:

    I was reading through some of your content on this site and I believe this website is very informative ! Retain putting up.

  7. Perfectly pent subject material , thanks for entropy.

  8. Enjoyed examining this, very good stuff, appreciate it.

  9. I dugg some of you post as I cogitated they were extremely helpful very beneficial

  10. I dugg some of you post as I cerebrated they were very beneficial very helpful

  11. It is in point of fact a great and useful piece of info. I am glad that you just shared this helpful information with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.

  12. certainly like your web site however you need to check the spelling on several of your posts. Many of them are rife with spelling problems and I find it very troublesome to inform the reality nevertheless I will surely come back again.

    • admin says:

      As a New Zealander, I use English rather than American spelling (e.g. “colour” versus “color”), which may account for most of your spell-checker’s red squiggles – not to mention local New Zealand Maori place names like Kaipara or Tauranga). However, notwithstanding all that, if you can point to specific cases, please go ahead. Thanks
      PWP

  13. Enjoyed reading through this, very good stuff, regards . “All things are difficult before they are easy.” by John Norley.

  14. Hello my family member! I wish to say that this article is awesome, nice written and include almost all vital infos. I’d like to see more posts like this.

  15. Fantastic website. Lots of useful info here. I am sending it to some buddies ans also sharing in delicious. And obviously, thank you for your effort!

  16. But wanna state that this is very helpful , Thanks for taking your time to write this.

  17. Thank you, I’ve just been looking for information approximately this subject for a while and yours is the greatest I have discovered so far. However, what concerning the bottom line? Are you sure concerning the source?

    • admin says:

      It comes down to my own opinion but I’ve had enough experience in the marine industry and applied physics to know just how expensive everything is compared broadly similar land-based projects. So, I’m in no hurry to invest in wave power anytime soon – probably never. Add to that the growing possibility that Rossi’s E-Cat may be the “real deal” and you have an even greater reason for not investing in wave power but perhaps being ready to invest in the E-Cat, if only to the extent of buying a small one. Even so, I’ll wait until the “early adopters” have reported back. We Kiwis (New Zealanders) are rather cautious about these sorts of things on the whole!
      PWP

Leave a Reply